Skip RBS type aliases as node signatures#948
Merged
Merged
Conversation
paracycle
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2026
paracycle
left a comment
paracycle
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The approach is a little ad-hoc, but I think that's fine.
amomchilov
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #947
Consumers of
node_rbs_commentsshouldn't receive a type alias comment. It's handled seperately inspoom/lib/spoom/sorbet/translate/rbs_comments_to_sorbet_sigs.rb
Line 368 in a2a5712